February 24, 2006
Mr. George F. Ohsiek, Jr.
Accounting Branch Chief
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street
Washington, D.C.
RE: |
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. |
|
Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
|
Filed March 14, 2005 |
|
File No. 001-31262 |
Dear Mr. Ohsiek:
As a follow up to our response dated February 1, 2006 to your letter dated January 18, 2006 (referred to as the Comment Letter) regarding Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (referred to as our Annual Report), we wanted to you make you aware of some additional information.
In preparing the restated cash flows in the manner described in our February 1, 2006 response to you, we reviewed our treatment of floor plan activity associated with our acquisitions and divestitures. Historically we have treated borrowings from our floor plan providers in connection with our acquisitions, and payments to our floor plan providers in connection with our divestitures, as non cash items. In other words, we have treated such floor plan borrowings as if they were assumed liabilities in these transactions. This treatment was consistent with the historical treatment of floor plan borrowings and repayments as an operating activity.
In each of our dealership acquisitions, we acquire new vehicle inventory. We fund that portion of the purchase price with borrowings from one of our floor plan lenders. We fund the remaining portion of the acquisition with cash or with borrowings from our acquisition line. We typically pay the portion of the purchase price related to the acquisition of the inventory to the sellers floor plan provider. The sellers floor plan provider will not release the lien nor pass the title until the floor plan has been repaid. As a result the sellers floor plan provider is typically paid directly in every acquisition. Therefore, the scheduling of the floor plan transition is an important component of the timing of an acquisitions closing date.
Based on the conclusions we reached in our February 1, 2006 letter, when those funds are borrowed from a non-manufacturer affiliated lender, we will disclose those borrowings in the financing activities section
in our consolidated statement of cash flows. When those funds are borrowed from a lender affiliated with vehicle manufacturer, we will also disclose those borrowings in the financing activities section of our consolidated statement of cash flows because we are purchasing the inventory from a dealer who is independent of our lending source. We reach the same conclusion even if the seller is using the same manufacturer affiliated lender from which we will borrow. Even though the lender remains the same, as we stated above, the relationship which gives rise to the operating activities treatment, in essence buying from the manufacturer of a product on credit, does not exist. In both instances, we will include the acquisition price of the new vehicle inventory in the acquisitions line of the investing activities section of our consolidated statement of cash flows. In the instance when any portion of the purchase price has been borrowed from a manufacturer affiliated floor plan lender, the repayment of those borrowings will be reflected as the repayment of non-affiliated floor plan in the financing activities section of our consolidated statement of cash flows.
In the case of divestitures, the same is true as stated above with the exception that we are on the other end of the transaction. In the instance of a dealership to be sold, we would have borrowed the funds used to acquire the new vehicle inventory held for sale from one of our floor plan providers and we would have the acquirer repay our floor plan lender with a portion of the proceeds from the acquisition, for the reasons stated above. Those proceeds typically come from the acquirers floor plan provider. When we sell new vehicle inventory in a dealership divestiture where the funds used to purchase the inventory being sold were borrowed from a non-manufacturer affiliated lender, we will include the repayment of such floor plan obligation in the financing activities section of our consolidated statement of cash flows. Likewise when we sell new vehicle inventory in a dealership divestiture where the funds to purchase the inventory being sold were borrowed from a manufacturer affiliated lender, we will include the repayment of such floor plan obligation in the operating activities section of our consolidated statement of cash flows. In both instances we will include the selling price of the new vehicle inventory in the proceeds from the sale of assets line of the investing activities section in our consolidated statement of cash flows.
We have concluded that this is the appropriate accounting treatment of floor plan activity in connection with acquisitions and divestitures. We want to make the Staff aware that this treatment may have the effect of materially decreasing operating cash flow as the result of divestiture activity as payments to manufacturer affiliated floor plan providers, in connection with our divestitures, will have the dollar-for-dollar impact of decreasing our operating cash flow.
In connection with the responses submitted herewith, we hereby acknowledge that:
The Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in our filings;
Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to such filings; and
The Company may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.
Please address any questions you may have to me at (212) 885-2521 or via facsimile at (212) 297-2651.
|
Sincerely, |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ J. Gordon Smith |
|
|
|
|
|
J. Gordon Smith |
|
|
Senior Vice President |
|
|
and Chief Financial Officer |